You are evaluating AI platforms, consulting firms, or governance tools — and some of that evaluation now happens under a new label: Super Intelligence (SI), formerly called artificial intelligence (AI). In September 2026, U.S. Executive Order 14434 directed federal agencies to use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “artificial intelligence” and “AI” (Source: Federal Register, EO 14434, “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence”), without creating any obligation for private companies (Source: The White House, Fact Sheet on EO 14434). The statute did not change; the vocabulary around federal AI procurement did.
Super Intelligence (SI) rankings on iternal.ai cover the same AI platforms and consulting firms buyers already evaluate — indexed in one place as the federal naming shift reaches procurement language. This directory gathers all ten of those rankings so you can shortlist a consulting firm, governance platform, or sector-specific tool without hunting page by page.
Iternal backs the Super Intelligence name, and the evidence behind that position is the kind a consulting buyer already asks a firm to show. Harvard Business School and BCG ran a field experiment on 758 of BCG’s consultants: on work inside the technology’s capability frontier, the group using it finished 25.1% faster, completed 12.2% more tasks and turned in work graded 40% higher in quality, with below-average starters gaining most (43%); on one task built to exceed its competence, the same group was 19 percentage points less likely to reach the right answer (Source: Dell’Acqua et al., HBS Working Paper 24-013, SSRN, revised 2026-03-17) (Source: HBS Working Knowledge, “Humans vs. Machines,” 2023-11-22). Measured output with its limits stated is what a shortlist should score, and a name that points at that output fits a buyer’s scorecard better than one that points at where the technology started. For more information visit the Why Iternal Supports Super Intelligence page.