2026 Enterprise Guide

Best Private & Self-Hosted AI Coding Assistants for Enterprise (2026)

A security-first roundup of private, on-premises, and air-gapped AI coding tools — ranked for enterprise, IT, and regulated software teams that cannot send source code to the cloud.

self-hosted AI coding air-gapped code assistant GitHub Copilot alternative AI coding agents private AI for developers ITAR-compliant coding

Last updated: June 5, 2026

AI coding assistants have become standard developer tooling, but the default deployment for most of them is the public cloud — your source code, prompts, and proprietary logic leave your perimeter to reach a hosted model. For enterprises in defense, government, finance, healthcare, and any organization handling CUI, ITAR-controlled data, or classified work, that is a non-starter. The good news: a mature market of private, self-hosted, and fully air-gapped AI coding assistants now exists, ranging from Apache 2.0 open-source harnesses to commercial platforms with on-prem and disconnected deployment tiers.

This guide ranks ten options on the criteria that matter to security and procurement teams: deployment model (cloud, on-prem, air-gap), data-handling guarantees, compliance posture (SOC 2, FedRAMP, IL5, ITAR/EAR), licensing, and developer experience. We treat every tool fairly — open-source projects like Continue.dev, Tabby, and Cline sit alongside commercial platforms like Tabnine, Windsurf, and Sourcegraph Cody, each with real strengths. For a broader view of on-prem AI tooling beyond coding, see our guide to the best local AI tools for enterprise. If the decision is about the hardware rather than the software, our ranking of the best private AI server options covers on-prem infrastructure instead.

Our Editor's Pick for the most restrictive environments is AirgapAI Code from Iternal Technologies — a terminal-native agentic assistant built to run fully disconnected with a perpetual license and no license-server callback. It is complementary to the strong commercial and open-source peers below, several of which also offer credible air-gap paths.

This ranking covers developer tooling. Looking for Microsoft 365 Copilot alternatives for the wider business instead? See Microsoft Copilot alternatives.

Private AI Coding Assistants at a Glance

Deployment, offline capability, licensing, and entry pricing for the top contenders.

Tool Air-Gap Capable Open Source License Model Entry Price
AirgapAI Code Perpetual or subscription $1,999 one-time
Tabnine Subscription $39/user/mo
Windsurf Subscription $15/user/mo
Tabby (TabbyML) Apache 2.0 Free
Continue.dev Apache 2.0 Free
Refact.ai Open source Free
Cline Apache 2.0 (BYOK) Free
Sourcegraph Cody Subscription $59/user/mo
CodeGeeX Open weights Free
GitHub Copilot Subscription $19/user/mo
Free download

Major Defense Contractor Achieves AI at the Edge

  • Air-gapped deployment for classified environments
  • CMMC 2.0 compliance maintained
  • ITAR-compliant AI operations

Instant download. We'll also email you a copy. No spam.

Our Recommendations

Best for Air-Gapped & Classified Teams

AirgapAI Code

A perpetual-license, single-binary agentic assistant that runs fully disconnected with no license-server callback — purpose-built for CUI, ITAR, and classified software work inside your perimeter.

See AirgapAI Code

Best Established Commercial Air-Gap Option

Tabnine

A triple-certified (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001) platform with a fully air-gapped Enterprise tier and documented Dell PowerEdge plus NVIDIA on-prem deployment paths.

Visit Tabnine

Best Open-Source Local-First Harness

Continue.dev

Apache 2.0, model-agnostic, and runs entirely local via Ollama or vLLM across VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim — total data sovereignty with bring-your-own-model freedom.

Visit Continue.dev

Plan Your Private AI Rollout

AI Strategy Blueprint

Map your secure AI tooling, deployment model, and compliance requirements before you buy with a structured strategy engagement from Iternal.

Build Your Blueprint

The 10 Best Private & Self-Hosted AI Coding Assistants

Ranked best-first for enterprise and regulated software teams — from the most restrictive air-gapped option to the cloud baseline.

#2

Tabnine

The most established air-gapped commercial assistant

4.6/5
$39/user/mo
Agentic Platform $59/user/mo · Enterprise custom (air-gapped)

Tabnine is one of the longest-standing commercial AI coding assistants with a credible, fully air-gapped Enterprise tier where no data leaves your infrastructure. It is triple-certified (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001), trains on none of your code, and offers contractual zero-retention guarantees — a frequent first choice for security-conscious enterprises.

Key Strengths

  • Fully air-gapped Enterprise deployment with SaaS, VPC, and on-prem options
  • Tabnine's own audited certifications: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and ISO 27001
  • Zero code retention, no training on your code, with contractual guarantees
  • Documented on-prem path using Dell PowerEdge servers and NVIDIA GPUs

Considerations

  • FedRAMP applies to its underlying cloud infrastructure (AWS/GCP), not to Tabnine as a SaaS product
  • Free plan discontinued — entry is now a paid seat
Best For: Enterprises wanting a mature, certified commercial assistant with a true air-gapped tier.
Visit Tabnine
#3

Windsurf

AI-native IDE with self-host and air-gap options

4.6/5
$15/user/mo
Pro · Teams $30 · Enterprise ~$60/user/mo

Windsurf (formerly Codeium, now part of Cognition AI) is an AI-native IDE built around its Cascade agent, with strong multi-file context. Its self-hosted deployment runs inference inside your network with no external API calls, and it carries notably strong compliance credentials including FedRAMP High and SOC 2 Type II — making it a genuine self-host and air-gap-capable peer.

Key Strengths

  • Self-hosted deployment is air-gap-capable with no external API calls
  • SOC 2 Type II plus FedRAMP High (ATO via Palantir FedStart on AWS GovCloud)
  • Extensions noted as DoD IL5- and ITAR-compliant; HIPAA BAAs available
  • Default zero-data-retention on paid seats and no training on user code

Considerations

  • Full self-host and air-gap deployment is an Enterprise-tier engagement, not the entry plan
  • Free tier is credit-limited (25 credits/month)
Best For: Teams wanting a modern AI-native IDE with strong context plus self-host and air-gap options.
Visit Windsurf
#4

Tabby (TabbyML)

Self-contained, fully offline open-source server

4.5/5
Open source
Optional Cloud Team $24/user/mo (managed)

Tabby is an Apache 2.0, Rust-built coding assistant that runs as a self-contained server and operates fully offline after a one-time model download. It gives teams centralized, self-hosted control over their AI tooling with broad GPU support (CUDA and Metal), and an active project with roughly 33,000 GitHub stars.

Key Strengths

  • Apache 2.0 license — fully open source and self-hostable
  • Runs completely offline after the model is downloaded
  • Self-contained Rust server with CUDA and Metal GPU support
  • Active, popular project with an optional managed cloud tier

Considerations

  • Self-hosting requires you to provision and maintain GPU infrastructure
  • Smaller ecosystem than the largest commercial platforms
Best For: Teams of roughly 5 to 50 wanting centralized, self-hosted control over their coding assistant.
Visit Tabby
#5

Continue.dev

Model-agnostic, local-first open-source harness

4.5/5
Open source
Apache 2.0 · bring your own model

Continue.dev is an Apache 2.0, model-agnostic harness that lets you connect any model — including fully local runtimes via Ollama, vLLM, or LM Studio — across VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim. Because you supply and host the model, it delivers complete data sovereignty, and the project has roughly 2.5M installs and 32k+ stars.

Key Strengths

  • Apache 2.0 and fully model-agnostic — connect cloud or local models
  • Local-first privacy via Ollama, vLLM, or LM Studio
  • Works in VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim
  • Large, active community with ~2.5M installs

Considerations

  • It is the harness, not a model — you must supply and host the LLM yourself
  • Local model quality depends entirely on the runtime and hardware you choose
Best For: Developers and teams wanting local-first data sovereignty with full model choice.
Visit Continue.dev
#6

Refact.ai

Top open-source agent on SWE-bench Verified

4.4/5
Open source
Pro $10/mo · Enterprise custom (on-prem)

Refact.ai is an open-source coding agent that ranks as the #1 open-source AI agent on SWE-bench Verified. Its local-first architecture self-hosts via Docker or AWS Marketplace, supports bring-your-own models with local runtimes like Ollama and vLLM, and its Enterprise tier adds on-prem deployment, codebase fine-tuning, and zero telemetry.

Key Strengths

  • #1 open-source AI agent on SWE-bench Verified
  • Local-first design with on-prem self-hosting via Docker or AWS
  • Bring-your-own models plus local runtimes (Ollama, LM Studio, vLLM)
  • Enterprise tier adds codebase fine-tuning and zero telemetry

Considerations

  • Advanced fine-tuning and zero-telemetry features require the custom Enterprise tier
  • Free tier is metered by a monthly coin allowance (BYOK requests excluded)
Best For: Teams wanting an open-source autonomous agent to run on-prem and fine-tune on their code.
Visit Refact.ai
#7

Cline

Most-installed open-source agent, bring-your-own-key

4.4/5
Open source
Apache 2.0 · pay only your model provider

Cline is an Apache 2.0, bring-your-own-key agent and the most-installed AI extension for VS Code with 5M+ installs and roughly 62,000 GitHub stars. It runs client-side, keeps code local with BYOK or local models, and supports Plan/Act modes, terminal execution, and approval gates across VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, Windsurf, and Zed.

Key Strengths

  • Apache 2.0 and free — pay only your own model provider, or $0 with local models
  • Code stays local with BYOK; supports Ollama, LM Studio, and any OpenAI-compatible endpoint
  • Plan/Act modes, terminal execution, and human approval gates
  • Most-installed VS Code AI extension with 30+ provider integrations

Considerations

  • BYOK model means you manage API keys and provider costs yourself
  • Air-gapped operation depends on pairing it with a self-hosted local model
Best For: Developers wanting a powerful, free, client-side agent with full model and provider control.
Visit Cline
#8

Sourcegraph Cody

Best-in-class cross-repo context for large orgs

4.3/5
$59/user/mo
Enterprise only; individuals now use Sourcegraph Amp

Sourcegraph Cody is an Enterprise-only assistant built on Sourcegraph's industry-leading code search, giving large organizations best-in-class cross-repo context. It can be self-hosted for data control, supports bring-your-own LLM (including self-hosted local models), and contractually will not train on your data. Individual developers now use Sourcegraph's separate Amp tool.

Key Strengths

  • Best-in-class cross-repo context powered by Sourcegraph code search
  • Self-hosted Enterprise deployment for full data control
  • Bring-your-own LLM, including self-hosted local models
  • Contractual commitment to not train on your data

Considerations

  • Free and Pro tiers were discontinued in 2025 — Enterprise-only with a high minimum
  • A fully air-gapped configuration is not publicly documented and requires a sales conversation
Best For: Large organizations with many repositories needing best-in-class cross-repo context.
Visit Sourcegraph Cody
#9

CodeGeeX

Open-weight model with optional local deployment

4.1/5
Open weights
Self-hostable model weights; hosted plugin available

CodeGeeX is an open-weight coding model (current flagship CodeGeeX4-ALL-9B) developed by Zhipu AI. The publicly available weights are self-hostable and run offline on NVIDIA (V100/A100) or Ascend 910 hardware with quantization support, available via VS Code and JetBrains plugins — a flexible option for teams comfortable operating their own model.

Key Strengths

  • Open model weights are publicly available and self-hostable
  • Runs offline on NVIDIA or Ascend 910 hardware with quantization
  • VS Code and JetBrains plugins available
  • Sub-10B flagship model balances capability and footprint

Considerations

  • Developed by a China-based group (Zhipu AI), a data-governance consideration for some US and defense buyers
  • The hosted plugin may default to remote endpoints unless pointed at a local deployment
Best For: Teams comfortable self-hosting an open-weight model who want full offline control.
View on GitHub
#10

GitHub Copilot

The cloud-native baseline for GitHub teams

4.2/5
$19/user/mo
Enterprise $39 + required GitHub Enterprise Cloud $21 = ~$60/user/mo

GitHub Copilot is the most widely adopted AI coding assistant and the natural baseline for cloud-first teams already on GitHub. Business and Enterprise tiers offer zero-retention and admin policy controls, and it remains an excellent fit-for-purpose choice — though it is cloud-only, with no self-hosted or air-gapped option, which is why it anchors the bottom of a privacy-focused ranking.

Key Strengths

  • Deep, native integration across the GitHub ecosystem
  • Business and Enterprise tiers offer zero-retention and admin policy controls
  • Code completions and Next Edit Suggestions do not consume usage credits
  • Mature, widely adopted, and well-supported tooling

Considerations

  • Cloud-only — no self-hosted or air-gapped deployment option
  • All plans moved to usage-based billing in June 2026, adding cost variability beyond the base seat
Best For: Cloud-first GitHub teams without air-gap or data-residency constraints.
Visit GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot Alternatives You Can Run Inside Your Perimeter

GitHub Copilot is the cloud-native standard and the right default for teams already on GitHub. Where source code cannot leave the network, the alternatives that run inside your perimeter are Tabnine and Windsurf on their self-hosted tiers, the open-source harnesses Continue.dev, Tabby, Cline and Refact.ai, and AirgapAI Code for fully disconnected work.

Copilot earned its position: deep GitHub integration, mature tooling, and zero-retention plus admin policy controls on the Business and Enterprise tiers. It is the strongest choice when code is allowed to reach a hosted model. The nine below are ranked on one different question — how much of the assistant can you keep behind your own firewall — and several of them are excellent tools in their own right regardless of where they run.

  1. AirgapAI Code — Runs fully disconnected with no license-server callback, on a perpetual one-time license — the complement for CUI, ITAR and classified work that cannot reach any cloud endpoint.
  2. Tabnine — The most established commercial air-gapped tier, carrying SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and ISO 27001 certifications with a documented Dell PowerEdge and NVIDIA on-prem path.
  3. Windsurf — Self-hosted deployment runs inference with no external API calls, backed by FedRAMP High and SOC 2 Type II, so the Cascade agent stays inside the network.
  4. Continue.dev — Apache 2.0 harness that points VS Code, JetBrains and Neovim at a model you host yourself through Ollama, vLLM or LM Studio — completions and chat without an outbound call.
  5. Tabby (TabbyML) — A self-contained Rust server that runs completely offline after the model download, giving a team one centrally managed replacement for cloud completion.
  6. Refact.ai — Open-source agent that self-hosts via Docker or AWS, with codebase fine-tuning and zero telemetry on the Enterprise tier.
  7. Cline — Apache 2.0 and bring-your-own-key: the extension runs client-side, and pairing it with a local model removes the last outbound dependency.
  8. Sourcegraph Cody — Self-hosted Enterprise deployment with bring-your-own LLM for organizations whose real requirement is cross-repo context; a fully air-gapped configuration is not publicly documented.
  9. CodeGeeX — Open weights you can run offline on NVIDIA or Ascend hardware when you would rather operate the model itself, with VS Code and JetBrains plugins in front of it.

Where to go next

  • AirgapAI Code — the private, self-hosted complement to a cloud assistant, with the agent loop running on the developer's own machine.
  • For more information visit the working with AI coding agents page, which covers the practices that hold up in a real codebase.

AI Coding Agents vs Coding Assistants: Which Tools Run the Whole Loop

An AI coding assistant completes and explains code you are writing. An AI coding agent takes an objective, edits across multiple files, runs the build and test loop, and iterates until it passes. Agents need repository context and permission to execute commands, which is what makes their deployment model matter.

That difference decides the security review. A completion model sees the file you have open; an agent sees the repository, writes to it, and runs commands on the machine. Where the code is regulated, the question stops being which model is smartest and becomes which parts of the loop stay inside the network.

Tool Runs an agent loop Multi-file edits Test and terminal loop Repo-wide context Runs air-gapped
AirgapAI Code Autonomous, terminal-native, with parallel specialist sub-agents (Entourage Mode) Generates and refactors across files Creates tests and runs build and validation loops until acceptance criteria are met Executes an objective across the entire repository Yes, fully disconnected with no license-server callback
Windsurf Yes, the Cascade agent Yes, multi-file editing with strong context Yes, command execution inside the IDE Workspace-wide indexing Yes, on the self-hosted Enterprise tier with no external API calls
Refact.ai Yes, autonomous agent (top-ranked open-source agent on SWE-bench Verified) Yes Yes, tool use and validation as part of the agent run Repository context, with codebase fine-tuning on Enterprise Yes, self-hosted via Docker or AWS with zero telemetry on Enterprise
Cline Yes, Plan and Act modes with human approval gates Yes Yes, terminal execution with approval before each step Workspace files; depth depends on the model you connect Yes, when paired with a self-hosted model instead of a provider key
Tabnine Yes, on the Agentic Platform tier Yes, on the agent tier Test-generation and code-review agents Workspace and repository context Yes, on the fully air-gapped Enterprise deployment
GitHub Copilot Yes, agent mode and the GitHub-hosted coding agent Yes Yes, in the hosted GitHub environment Repository and GitHub project context No, cloud-only by design
Continue.dev Agent mode in the harness; the loop is only as capable as the model behind it Model-dependent Model-dependent Codebase indexing you run locally Yes, with a local model through Ollama, vLLM or LM Studio
Sourcegraph Cody Chat and inline edits; Sourcegraph ships its agent as the separate Amp product Command-driven edits Not part of the assistant Best-in-class cross-repo context from Sourcegraph code search Self-hosted Enterprise; a full air-gap configuration is not publicly documented
Tabby (TabbyML) Completion, chat and an answer engine rather than an agent loop No No Repository indexing for retrieval-backed answers Yes, completely offline after the model download
CodeGeeX An open-weight model with IDE plugins, not an agent harness No No File and project context inside the plugin Yes, self-hosted weights on NVIDIA or Ascend hardware

An agent loop spends far more inference per task than completion does, so self-hosting one raises the hardware question before the tooling question: size the GPU or Xeon capacity for sustained generation, not for occasional autocomplete. If you are specifying that machine, compare the turnkey AI appliance rankings first, then pick the agent that will run on it.

Working with agents in practice

  • For more information visit the working with AI coding agents page: scoping a run, the standing rules file, reviewing the diff, and capping the spend.
  • AirgapAI Code runs the same loop on a disconnected workstation, with optional local audit logging for the security team.

Why AirgapAI Code for CUI, ITAR & Classified Software Teams

Iternal's complementary offering for the most restrictive disconnected environments — purpose-built for teams that cannot tolerate any cloud dependency or recurring license callback.

Truly Disconnected Operation

All AI processing happens 100% locally on the device. AirgapAI Code runs fully air-gapped with no network connection — source code, prompts, and generated output never leave the machine, and all outbound communications can be disabled by design.

Perpetual License, No Callback

A one-time $1,999 perpetual license removes per-seat subscriptions entirely. There is no license-server callback, so the software keeps working indefinitely inside disconnected and classified networks with no phone-home requirement.

Compliance-Aligned Architecture

Built for regulated work: every model call stays inside your boundary, so deployments support FedRAMP, NIST 800-171/CMMC and HIPAA/PHI programs with no hosted service in scope — the posture defense, intelligence, and regulated software teams require.

Single-Binary Desktop Deploy

Deploy on Windows 10+ or macOS Apple Silicon as a single application, with full VDI and Citrix support for the virtualized desktop infrastructure common in government and regulated industries.

Bring Your Own Model

Integrate custom and approved models so your team controls exactly which weights run inside the perimeter — no dependency on a hosted endpoint or external API for inference.

Zero Mandatory Telemetry

There is no required telemetry or data collection. Optional local audit logging gives security teams on-prem governance and traceability without any data ever leaving the environment.

Trusted in the Most Demanding Environments

Iternal's air-gapped AI has earned its place where security cannot be compromised.

$5M in 12 months
An Iternal partner, VTech, generated $5M in revenue within 12 months of bringing Iternal's AI solutions to market.
Iternal partner program results
Coolest thing at CES
Iternal's Dell partnership and on-device AI demonstration was hailed as one of the coolest things at CES.
Dell partnership, CES
SCIF & nuclear-grade
Iternal's air-gapped AI has met the certification bar for deployment in nuclear facilities and SCIF environments.
Nuclear-facility / SCIF certification
Fortune 200 scale
Iternal AI is deployed across Fortune 200 manufacturing operations handling sensitive, proprietary data.
Fortune 200 manufacturing deployments

Frequently Asked Questions

A self-hosted AI coding assistant runs its model and inference inside your own infrastructure — on your servers, your VDI environment, or directly on developer workstations — rather than sending code to a hosted cloud service. This keeps source code, prompts, and generated output within your security perimeter, which is essential for organizations handling regulated, proprietary, or classified data. Options range from open-source harnesses like Continue.dev and Tabby to commercial platforms like Tabnine and AirgapAI Code.
Several tools support air-gapped operation. AirgapAI Code is built to run entirely disconnected with no network connection and no license-server callback. Tabnine offers a fully air-gapped Enterprise tier, and Windsurf's self-hosted deployment runs inference with no external API calls. Open-source options like Tabby and Continue.dev run offline once you download a local model. The right choice depends on whether you need a perpetual license, commercial support, or open-source flexibility.
GitHub Copilot is a cloud-native baseline — code is sent to hosted models, with no self-hosted or air-gapped option. AirgapAI Code is the opposite end of the spectrum: it processes everything locally, can operate fully disconnected, uses a perpetual one-time license instead of per-seat subscriptions, and requires no license-server callback. It is designed for CUI, ITAR, and classified software teams that cannot send code to the cloud at all.
Yes, when deployed correctly. Apache 2.0 tools like Continue.dev, Tabby, and Cline let you run models entirely within your infrastructure, giving you full control over data flow and the ability to audit the code. The trade-off is operational: you provision and maintain the GPU infrastructure and model runtime yourself. For teams wanting commercial support, certifications, or turnkey air-gap deployment, a platform like AirgapAI Code or Tabnine reduces that operational burden. Choosing the hardware rather than the assistant? Compare private AI servers and appliances.
For regulated buyers, look for SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and GDPR as a baseline — Tabnine holds all three as audited certifications. For government and defense work, FedRAMP, DoD IL5, and ITAR/EAR alignment matter; Windsurf carries FedRAMP High and SOC 2 Type II, while AirgapAI Code runs fully inside your boundary, so deployments support FedRAMP, NIST 800-171/CMMC and HIPAA programs with no hosted service in scope, and ITAR-controlled programs are covered on our AI for defense and aerospace page. Always confirm whether a certification applies to the product itself or only to its underlying cloud infrastructure.
AirgapAI Code offers a perpetual one-time license at $1,999 per device (its best-value option), a monthly subscription at $80 per device with a 7-day free trial, and a $2,999 one-time Enterprise license that adds dedicated onboarding and priority phone and email support. All tiers include Windows and macOS support, VDI/Citrix deployment, and custom model integration. See current details on the AirgapAI Code page.
Many of them, yes. Continue.dev, Cline, and Refact.ai are model-agnostic and let you connect cloud or local models via runtimes like Ollama, vLLM, and LM Studio. Sourcegraph Cody supports bring-your-own LLM including self-hosted models, and AirgapAI Code supports custom model integration so your team controls exactly which approved weights run inside the perimeter. Bringing your own model is key to keeping inference fully within your environment.
Start with your hard constraints. If you require fully disconnected operation with a perpetual license, AirgapAI Code is the natural fit. If you want a certified commercial platform with an air-gapped tier, consider Tabnine or Windsurf. If you prefer open source and have infrastructure to run it, Continue.dev, Tabby, Cline, and Refact.ai are excellent. We recommend mapping requirements first — our AI Strategy Blueprint helps structure that decision before you commit.
Yes, once three pieces are in place. The model has to be hosted inside the network — a local runtime such as Ollama or vLLM, or an assistant that ships its own inference like AirgapAI Code. The agent's tools have to resolve against internal mirrors, so the build, the test runner and the package manager work without reaching the public internet. And the license has to keep working with no callback, which is why perpetual licensing matters in disconnected environments. A tool that only proxies a cloud API cannot be made air-gapped by configuration, which is why the deployment column matters more than the feature list when you shortlist agents.
It depends on whether you want to operate the model yourself. Continue.dev is the strongest free local harness — Apache 2.0, model-agnostic, and available in VS Code, JetBrains and Neovim against Ollama, vLLM or LM Studio. Tabby is the better pick when you want one self-contained server for a whole team instead of a per-developer setup, and Refact.ai adds an autonomous agent you can self-host via Docker. If you would rather buy the loop with support, a perpetual license and no network dependency at all, AirgapAI Code runs locally on Windows and macOS. GitHub Copilot remains the reference point for teams whose code can go to the cloud.

Ready to Code Securely Inside Your Perimeter?

If your team handles CUI, ITAR-controlled, or classified work, AirgapAI Code delivers autonomous AI coding that never touches the cloud — with a perpetual license and no license-server callback. Explore the product or map your secure AI rollout with a strategy engagement.